Provas para Download

Prova Professor Ensino Fundamental II - Inglês 10H - Pref. Caçador/SC
Visualizar os arquivos PDF
Ver professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
PDF
professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
Ver gabarito.pdf
PDF
gabarito.pdf
Download dos arquivos PDF
Baixar professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
PDF
professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
Baixar gabarito.pdf
PDF
gabarito.pdf
Compartilhar os arquivos PDF
Compartilhar professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
PDF
professor-ensino-fundamental-ii-ingles-10h.pdf
Compartilhe:
Questões extraídas da Prova :: clique na alternativa correta
0
Acertos
0
Erros
0%
Nota
Limpar
Questão 1 de 10 Q1186069 Q24 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is whether they could have predicted a disaster like this. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about where these areas are, is very limited. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recently. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas where there have been no earthquakes in recorded history. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For example, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

Study these sentences and decide if they are true ( T ) or false ( F ), according to the article.

Reportar Erro
Questão 2 de 10 Q1186070 Q25 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is whether they could have predicted a disaster like this. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about where these areas are, is very limited. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recently. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas where there have been no earthquakes in recorded history. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For exemplo, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

After reading the text carefully, we can infer that the main intention of the author of the article is to:

Reportar Erro
Questão 3 de 10 Q1186071 Q26 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is whether they could have predicted a disaster like this. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about onde essas áreas são, é muito limitada. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recently. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas where there have been no earthquakes in recorded history. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For exemplo, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

Read paragraph 2 and, according to its information mark the correct alternative.

Reportar Erro
Questão 4 de 10 Q1186072 Q27 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is se eles poderiam ter previsto um desastre como esse. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about onde essas áreas são, é muito limitada. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recently. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas where there have been no earthquakes in recorded history. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For exemplo, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

Choose the alternative that presents the correct words that are missing in the last paragraph.

Reportar Erro
Questão 5 de 10 Q1186073 Q28 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is se eles poderiam ter previsto um desastre como esse. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about onde essas áreas são, é muito limitada. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recentemente. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas where there have been no earthquakes in recorded history. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For exemplo, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

Analyze the following sentences according to the information in paragraph 3. 1. The team at Rutgers was experimenting with creating electric signals. 2. None of the physicists expected pharmaceutical powders to stick together. 3. The small lightning bolt, or electric charge, followed a short time after the powder had fallen apart. 4. The electrical charge only affected powders that have fallen apart suddenly. 5. In the experiment, the electric charge always appeared before the materials fell apart. Choose the alternative which contains the correct sentences.

Reportar Erro
Questão 6 de 10 Q1186074 Q29 da prova
Predicting the unpredictable Some years ago, a devastating earthquake struck the Italian town of L’Aquila. More than 300 people lost their lives, over 1,500 people were injured, and many buildings were destroyed. Two years later, seven earthquake experts were involved in a court case: Did they adequately warn the public after the initial tremors began? At the heart of the debate is se eles poderiam ter previsto um desastre como esse. Although a lot of scientists are working to improve our ability to predict natural disasters, so far no one has come up with a reliable method to forecast earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, days or weeks beforehand. Most of the research focuses on the areas most likely to experience seismic activity – but even our knowledge about onde essas áreas são, é muito limitada. One reason for this is that human beings have only been around for a very small part of the Earth’s history. In geological terms, we all arrived on the scene very recentemente. Records from the past 2,000 years are incomplete, and the biggest earthquakes nearly always happen in areas onde não houve terremotos na história registrada. So, is there any hope for improving our ability to predict disasters? A solution may come from an unexpected source. Four years ago, a team of US physicists at Rutgers University in New Jersey were studying why pharmaceutical powders stick together. They observed that the powder stuck together when placed in a spinning cylinder, but then developed cracks and collapsed. Just before the cracks developed, an electric signal, like a small bolt of lightning, was created. The scientists repeated the experiment with a wide range of different materials, and they got similar results every time. This phenomenon might also exist in nature. Some scientists believe that rocks may become electrically charged under unusual pressure, such as before an earthquake. This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do. For example, while biologists were studying a colony of frogs in a pond near L’Aquila, they noticed that nearly all the animals left the water days before the earthquake. A similar thing happened in China, when snakes were hibernating for the winter in caves, but escaped just before a large earthquake. The same kind of electric charge, like the small bolt of lightning felt in the experiment at Rutgers, may have been responsible. At the moment, there is no reliable way using such findings to predict earthquakes, and further studies may be necessary to give us a better understanding of the interactions involved, but one day, the technology may be used predict future catastrophes. For exemplo, two science institutions in Russia and Britain are already developing a new micro-satellite, which could detect these electric signals and help rescue people natural disasters in time. Scientists are planning to launch the first of these satellites space. Will these satellites be the solution? Only time will tell. For the time being, the best defense is to be prepared.

Why is the title of the article, “Predicting the unpredictable,” appropriate?

Reportar Erro
Questão 7 de 10 Q1186075 Q30 da prova

Mark the alternative which contains the correct meaning of the underlined words from the text.

Reportar Erro
Questão 8 de 10 Q1186076 Q31 da prova

In the sentence, This electric charge then causes changes in the surrounding air or water, which animals may be able to sense before humans do (paragraph 3), the underlined relative pronoun which refers to:

Reportar Erro
Questão 9 de 10 Q1186077 Q32 da prova

There are a variety of teaching methods and strategies available to teachers to help their students learn or develop knowledge and skills. Choose the alternative that contains some examples of teaching methods and strategies.

Reportar Erro
Questão 10 de 10 Q1186078 Q33 da prova

Active Learning Strategy is a teaching technique that increases student engagement in daily lessons. This technique can also help teachers to become more actively engaged in how they teach the curriculum and how they develop each student’s learning potential. Choose the alternative that presents an active learning strategy.

Reportar Erro
0
Acertos
0
Erros
0%
Nota
Limpar

Acertos
Erros
Nota